This Marine was onboard the ship that was attacked by Jewish "commandos" on it's way to relieve the blockade of Gaza. You know, the one where 9 unarmed people were shot dead? This Marine disarmed a Jew and could have shot him dead but didn't. Here he tangles with a Jewish mouthpiece on BBC.
We could really use men like this. My belief is that as more people come to the realization that peaceable resistance is fruitless, they will turn to other means. I await that day with open arms.
The rest of the interrogation by the "impartial" BBC is here.
Showing posts with label Gaza. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gaza. Show all posts
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Why The Jews Pulled Out of Gaza
Picked this up off David Irving's site. This is a comment from an article in an Israeli paper that is very enlightening.
Talkback
Title: Fogel is mistaken. When IDF got in urban areas it bogged down!
Name: Lt. Col. Avi G.
City: Jerusalem State: Israel
While Fogels comments are interesting, he was safely in the rear and
not up front where we were getting shot at. The IDF advance went well until we got into the heavily populated areas of Gaza. Our tanks could not maneuver
properly. The streets were too narrow and the anti-tank fire became so heavy
that our forces were ordered to pull back to prevent casualties. Yes, we could have destoyed Hamas eventually but the cost would have been in hundreds of IDF troop deaths and wounded. Hamas of today is not Hamas 10 years ago. They are a well trained Commando Force second only to Hizbullah today. Fogel reminds me of a story my late Father use to tell, "We killed a bear but Daddy shot him."
See? You wouldn't know it from reading the jewish controlled media in this country, but resistance to evil is always correct, just and most importantly, possible. When the jews get their tits in a wringer, they run like cowards. Only when they think they have you tied down and unable to resist will they try to murder you. Remember that in the future. It will come in handy.
Talkback
Title: Fogel is mistaken. When IDF got in urban areas it bogged down!
Name: Lt. Col. Avi G.
City: Jerusalem State: Israel
While Fogels comments are interesting, he was safely in the rear and
not up front where we were getting shot at. The IDF advance went well until we got into the heavily populated areas of Gaza. Our tanks could not maneuver
properly. The streets were too narrow and the anti-tank fire became so heavy
that our forces were ordered to pull back to prevent casualties. Yes, we could have destoyed Hamas eventually but the cost would have been in hundreds of IDF troop deaths and wounded. Hamas of today is not Hamas 10 years ago. They are a well trained Commando Force second only to Hizbullah today. Fogel reminds me of a story my late Father use to tell, "We killed a bear but Daddy shot him."
See? You wouldn't know it from reading the jewish controlled media in this country, but resistance to evil is always correct, just and most importantly, possible. When the jews get their tits in a wringer, they run like cowards. Only when they think they have you tied down and unable to resist will they try to murder you. Remember that in the future. It will come in handy.
Sunday, January 4, 2009
ZOG Blocks UN Resolution Concerning Gaza
Are we powerful or what? Listen. People will tell you that you are a crazy, conspiratorial, jew-baiting antisemite if you point out things like this. Believe me, YOU ARE NOT. It is they that are on the Matrix and not you, having been freed from it by the truth. Deep down though, most people know you are right, they are just cowards who care only for what's good for them.
Behold, your ambassador to the United Nations.
Of course, he's no worse than this traitor.
Now, if your trigger finger doesn't get itchy at the sight of this jew tool, nothing will. So you see, traitors come in all colors of the rainbow. Why? Because thats the way Babylon is.
diplomats said the United States refused to back the Libyan-drafted text and killed the initiative, since council statements must be passed unanimously. Later the United States refused to back a watered-down call for a truce, the diplomats said.
Behold, your ambassador to the United Nations.
Of course, he's no worse than this traitor.
Now, if your trigger finger doesn't get itchy at the sight of this jew tool, nothing will. So you see, traitors come in all colors of the rainbow. Why? Because thats the way Babylon is.
Why Some People Are Called Terrorists and Others Aren't
From the ADV Broadcast Labels by Dr. William L. Pierce on 12-22-2001. Just as applicable today as it was back then.
"Terrorism" and "terrorist" have been the most-used words on television and in the other controlled news media recently. We've heard over and over about al-Quaeda terrorism and Iraqi terrorism and Palestinian terrorism -- especially about Palestinian terrorism during the past week, with the Bush government repeatedly demanding that Yasser Arafat arrest every Palestinian designated as a "terrorist" on a list given to him by Israel. But we haven't heard anything about Israeli terrorism or about U.S. terrorism: not even a word. The controlled news media in America would have us believe that the governments of Israel and the United States don't engage in terrorism.
So how do we decide what is terrorism and what isn't? Is terrorism what individuals or small groups do when they're angry at a government, but what governments do is legitimate warfare or self-defense or something else other than terrorism?
No, no, that can't be, because we were told that the government of Afghanistan that we just destroyed was a terrorist government, and so is the government of Iraq, which the media want us to destroy next. So maybe it's the type of weapon that's used that determines whether an action is terrorism or not. If one uses a car bomb or a human bomb, as the Palestinians often do, it's terrorism. If one uses a helicopter gun ship, as the Israelis often use to assassinate Palestinian leaders, or an airplane, like we use to bomb Afghanistan, it's not terrorism.
No, no, that can't be right, because Osama bin Laden used airplanes in his attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and we were assured that was terrorism. So why is Mr. Bush's aerial bombing of Kabul or Kandahar not terrorism, while Osama bin Laden's aerial bombing of New York and Washington was? Why wasn't the Clinton government's aerial bombing of Belgrade two years ago called "terrorism" by the media?
Perhaps what distinguishes legitimate warfare from terrorism is motivation. In warfare one attempts to destroy the enemy's military forces and to capture territory from the enemy; in terrorism one attempts to demoralize or terrify the enemy. But then what should we call the carpet-bombing of German cities by the United States during the Second World War? The motive there was to kill as many German civilians as possible and demoralize the German public. That also was the motive behind Britain's program to drop millions of anthrax bombs on Germany during the war. Fortunately, the Second World War ended before Britain could use the anthrax bombs it had prepared, but Churchill had fully intended to use them -- and to use them when it already was apparent that Germany was losing the war. Why is Winston Churchill regarded by all of the controlled media as a hero, as a great and good man, while whoever is mailing anthrax-infected letters to politicians and media bosses in the United States today is regarded as a "terrorist" and is described as "evil" and "cowardly"?
Well, by now the reason why an act of terror is sometimes called "terrorism" and sometimes isn't should be obvious. If someone we don't like does it to us, it's terrorism; if we do it to someone else, it isn't. More to the point, if someone the media bosses don't like strikes at Jews -- Israelis, for example -- or at someone friendly to the Jews -- the U.S. government, for example -- then it's terrorism. If Jews -- Israelis, for example -- strike at Palestinians, or if the U.S. government strikes at anyone -- Afghans or Iraqis, for example -- on behalf of the Jews, then it isn't terrorism.
A somewhat trickier case was the attempt by the Israelis in 1967 to sink the U.S. Navy ship, the Liberty, so that it could be blamed on the Egyptians, generating U.S. hostility against Egypt. Although the attempt failed, the Israelis did kill 35 Americans in their terror attack on the Liberty. The controlled media, of course, not only didn't call it "terrorism" but did their best to hush it up by giving it minimal news coverage. So the rule is: if it's an attack by Jews or on behalf of Jews it's not terrorism. If it's an attack against Jews or against Jewish interests, it is terrorism. That's why Ariel Sharon isn't a terrorist, and Osama bin Laden is. Understand?"
"Terrorism" and "terrorist" have been the most-used words on television and in the other controlled news media recently. We've heard over and over about al-Quaeda terrorism and Iraqi terrorism and Palestinian terrorism -- especially about Palestinian terrorism during the past week, with the Bush government repeatedly demanding that Yasser Arafat arrest every Palestinian designated as a "terrorist" on a list given to him by Israel. But we haven't heard anything about Israeli terrorism or about U.S. terrorism: not even a word. The controlled news media in America would have us believe that the governments of Israel and the United States don't engage in terrorism.
So how do we decide what is terrorism and what isn't? Is terrorism what individuals or small groups do when they're angry at a government, but what governments do is legitimate warfare or self-defense or something else other than terrorism?
No, no, that can't be, because we were told that the government of Afghanistan that we just destroyed was a terrorist government, and so is the government of Iraq, which the media want us to destroy next. So maybe it's the type of weapon that's used that determines whether an action is terrorism or not. If one uses a car bomb or a human bomb, as the Palestinians often do, it's terrorism. If one uses a helicopter gun ship, as the Israelis often use to assassinate Palestinian leaders, or an airplane, like we use to bomb Afghanistan, it's not terrorism.
No, no, that can't be right, because Osama bin Laden used airplanes in his attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and we were assured that was terrorism. So why is Mr. Bush's aerial bombing of Kabul or Kandahar not terrorism, while Osama bin Laden's aerial bombing of New York and Washington was? Why wasn't the Clinton government's aerial bombing of Belgrade two years ago called "terrorism" by the media?
Perhaps what distinguishes legitimate warfare from terrorism is motivation. In warfare one attempts to destroy the enemy's military forces and to capture territory from the enemy; in terrorism one attempts to demoralize or terrify the enemy. But then what should we call the carpet-bombing of German cities by the United States during the Second World War? The motive there was to kill as many German civilians as possible and demoralize the German public. That also was the motive behind Britain's program to drop millions of anthrax bombs on Germany during the war. Fortunately, the Second World War ended before Britain could use the anthrax bombs it had prepared, but Churchill had fully intended to use them -- and to use them when it already was apparent that Germany was losing the war. Why is Winston Churchill regarded by all of the controlled media as a hero, as a great and good man, while whoever is mailing anthrax-infected letters to politicians and media bosses in the United States today is regarded as a "terrorist" and is described as "evil" and "cowardly"?
Well, by now the reason why an act of terror is sometimes called "terrorism" and sometimes isn't should be obvious. If someone we don't like does it to us, it's terrorism; if we do it to someone else, it isn't. More to the point, if someone the media bosses don't like strikes at Jews -- Israelis, for example -- or at someone friendly to the Jews -- the U.S. government, for example -- then it's terrorism. If Jews -- Israelis, for example -- strike at Palestinians, or if the U.S. government strikes at anyone -- Afghans or Iraqis, for example -- on behalf of the Jews, then it isn't terrorism.
A somewhat trickier case was the attempt by the Israelis in 1967 to sink the U.S. Navy ship, the Liberty, so that it could be blamed on the Egyptians, generating U.S. hostility against Egypt. Although the attempt failed, the Israelis did kill 35 Americans in their terror attack on the Liberty. The controlled media, of course, not only didn't call it "terrorism" but did their best to hush it up by giving it minimal news coverage. So the rule is: if it's an attack by Jews or on behalf of Jews it's not terrorism. If it's an attack against Jews or against Jewish interests, it is terrorism. That's why Ariel Sharon isn't a terrorist, and Osama bin Laden is. Understand?"
"Whoever Establishes a Relation with The Enemy Is Nothing But a Criminal"
I don't usually grab something from someone else's site, but this one needs wide dissemination. I got this off of incogman's blog, a blog everyone should visit.
A Palestinian lays dying, yet with his last breath he keeps the faith and his bond to his people. That's what resistance is all about. It's something the jews can never kill. They are genetically incapable of understanding this, as murder is the weapon the jews use to further their goals, and the threat of murder to keep people silent. So while George and Barak sit on their hands in silence by order of their jewish keepers, the world groans under their misfortune, the jews.
Anyone that collaborates with or gives comfort to our enemies is a traitor, and deserves traitors justice.
A Palestinian lays dying, yet with his last breath he keeps the faith and his bond to his people. That's what resistance is all about. It's something the jews can never kill. They are genetically incapable of understanding this, as murder is the weapon the jews use to further their goals, and the threat of murder to keep people silent. So while George and Barak sit on their hands in silence by order of their jewish keepers, the world groans under their misfortune, the jews.
Anyone that collaborates with or gives comfort to our enemies is a traitor, and deserves traitors justice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)