Sunday, November 30, 2008

Guest Editorial - Lormarie.com

Added a new blog to my lefty links called lormarie.com. She posts on The Jewish Conspiracy Exposed and she seems to be a level headed poster who considers both sides of an issue, a rare thing nowadays. Whats even more amazing is she is black. Our readers probably won't agree with everything she has to say but at least she is sincere with her positions. Here is one of her recent posts . Give it a read and see what you think.


Here we have the story of a young Marine and his wife who were killed by a bunch of jealous, good for nothing, low life pieces of crap. The murderers are black males and the murder victims are a white man and his black wife. Whether you agree with mixed marriages or not, there is an important factor to consider. HAD THE KILLERS BEEN WHITE, THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN ALL OVER THE NEWS AND CALLED A HATE CRIME. You can believe Al Sharpton would have had his fat a** at Camp Pendleton crying, “no justice, no peace.”

The madness doesn’t stop there. Has anyone ever heard about the murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom? Probably not. Does the race of the killers have anything to do with it? You decide.

4 comments:

LFD said...

I read the link you provided. Therein, I found these gems:

"After all, white men usually have nothing to worry about when it comes to racism. You can imagine why I always yawn when I listen to a white man declare that he’s a victim of it."

"While most hate crimes are committed against blacks, we cannot ignore the fact that blacks have committed hate crimes against people of other races."

Her research is faulty at best; more likely non-existent. Has she never heard of racial quotas? A tour through any government office or postal facility will anecdotally show that whites are marginalized in these types of jobs.
As for hate crimes sometimes being committed by blacks, she seems to get her news only from the mainstream media. She seems completely unaware of the Fed's statistics showing a disproportionate amount of crimes by blacks against whites.
Sorry, my friend, but I am vastly un-impressed.

LFD said...

After ruminating on my last comment, I realize I was wrong.
Here's why:
The MMPI and Dept. of Justice statistics (among other studies) bear out the notion that race matters. Blacks and whites are inherently and genetically different. No matter how elevated the discourse, or any seeming "meeting of the minds" on a particular subject, the fact still remains that genetic connection trumps any intellectual or societal links. Blacks, of course, have realized this all along. That is why for decades they have defended their own, no matter how heinous the crime. So, it doesn't matter whether I'm impressed with a black person's writings or not. The fact remains that Whites should have no association with blacks. No matter how much we may find common ground, when the rubber meets the road, blacks will always defend their own. If only Whites could see fit to do the same.
Sorry for the verbosity.

lormarie said...

No matter how elevated the discourse, or any seeming "meeting of the minds" on a particular subject, the fact still remains that genetic connection trumps any intellectual or societal links.--LFD

Why, because you say so? I'd say the real world trumps genetic connections.

"Blacks, of course, have realized this all along. That is why for decades they have defended their own, no matter how heinous the crime."

I agree that that has been the case. But blacks sticking up for blacks (no matter what) has been to the detriment of the black collective.

So, it doesn't matter whether I'm impressed with a black person's writings or not. The fact remains that Whites should have no association with blacks.--LFD

You're right, it doesn't really matter if you're impressed. We come from two completely different worldviews so it's only logical that my views don't sit well with you nor do yours sit well with me. As far as associations are concerned, your statement is false (that is if you connect associations with contact).

"when the rubber meets the road, blacks will always defend their own. If only Whites could see fit to do the same."

I'd argue that blacks should NOT always defend their own. Happy to say that many are coming to that conclusion. Be careful what you wish for. If whites stood up for whites at the rate blacks stood for blacks, it would lead to more white on white division and intraracial fighting as a result. Someone will always place their needs above others. Even within racial groups.

Re: your comment about quotas. I'm still waiting for those of your belief to show hard proof that whites by and large are negatively impacted by quotas. The last time I checked, most universities, upper tiers of various companies, and Wall Street include numbers overwhelmingly white. Until I see otherwise, whites (men in particular) have very little to complain about.

Orion said...

Harvard is over 50% Jewish, City college of New York and Columbia are over 60%. Those aren't whites, Lormarie. Toss in the Asians both North and South and very few White men are able to attend the Universities their ancestors founded.

The only Whites getting into Universities are women, who love to have their ears tickled with anti-white propaganda and practice miscegenation to prove their loyalty to the New Order.